| 1. Journal (max 10) |
| SCImago (SJR) quartile in the relevant category: Q1: 6; Q2: 4; Q3: 2; Q4: 1 |
Journal |
6 |
|
PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Indexed in MEDLINE |
Journal |
2 |
|
| Published in JCIR |
Journal |
2 |
|
| 2. Methodology (max 35) |
| Appropriateness and strength of the study design for the research question. Jurors judge the
design against the question asked, not by study type alone: a rigorous prospective
diagnostic-accuracy or technical study, or a well-conducted registry, may score higher than a weak
meta-analysis |
Design |
12 |
|
PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Sample size justification and appropriate statistical analysis |
Rigour |
8 |
|
| Transparency of methods; ethics approval; trial or protocol registration; data availability |
Rigour |
8 |
|
| Adherence to the applicable reporting guideline (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, STARD or other) |
Rigour |
4 |
|
| Clarity of research question and objectives |
Rigour |
3 |
|
| 3. Originality (max 20) |
| Novelty of the research question |
Originality |
10 |
|
PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Innovation in technique, device, imaging or analysis |
Originality |
5 |
|
| Positioning against existing literature |
Originality |
5 |
|
| 4. Impact on patient care and public health (max 25) |
| Relevance to the practice of vascular and interventional radiology |
Impact |
8 |
|
PDF, DOC,
DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Potential to change clinical practice or guidelines |
Impact |
9 |
|
| Benefit to patient outcomes, safety, cost or access to care |
Impact |
8 |
|
| 5. Authorship and collaboration (max 5) |
| Nominee is first or corresponding author; 3: joint first author 2 |
Authorship |
3 |
|
PDF, DOC,
DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Multi-institutional or international collaboration |
Authorship |
2 |
|
| 6. Presentation (max 5) |
| Structure and clarity of writing; abstract |
Presentation |
3 |
|
PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, JPEG, PNG |
| Quality of figures and tables |
Presentation |
2 |
|